Viagra for sale online buy generic ed Medicines buy generic Viagra Buy generic Levitra drugs Buy Caverta Online Buy Cialis Super Active buy eriacta online without a perscription Buy Kamagra Cheap Online Order quality Kamagra Soft online buy ed meds Suhagra Without Prescription Purchase Tadalis Sx pills Buy generic Viagra Soft Tabs buy Vigora online Buy generic Cialis Daily Online Buy cialis sublingual online Buy Hard On Sildenafil Citrate Buy Kamagra Effervescent Online Lowest Prices Buy Viagra Professional Buy Viagra super dulox-force Online Buy Viagra Super Force Online buy viagra gold online buy Vardenafil Oral Jelly Cheapest Online Buy Levitra Professional Online buy avana online buy sildalis online buy tadalift online buy viagra oral jelly online buy tadora online buy Drugs cialis online buy online Apcalis oral jelly Buy Cialis soft Online No Prescription buy Generic Cialis Super Force online buy Intagra online order Kamagra Oral Jelly Buy Silagra Cheap online order Tadacip Without Prescription Buy ed trial packs online Buy cheapest generic Viagra Super Active buy zenegra online Buy Cialis Professional Online buy cialis black online Buy generic Hard On Oral Jelly buy Generic Viagra Capsules Online buy viagra sublingual online buy Viagra Super Fluox-force buy viagra strips online Buy generic Levitra Soft online buy Generic Levitra Super Force online buy levitra super active online Buy super avana Online buy silvitra online buy forzest online buy penegra online

Elizabeth Woodville – "The White Queen" – Was She A Witch?


Elizabeth Woodville and her mother create a ‘magic mist’.

The  BBC did an article on if Elizabeth Woodville was actually a witch, having historian Peter Maxwell-Stuart look into the suspicions surrounding Elizabeth and her mother, Jacquetta.

In the BBC One series ‘The White Queen’, Elizabeth Woodville and her mother Jacquetta conjure a mist to help her husband Edward IV defeat his enemies.

But did they really practise witchcraft? Historian Peter Maxwell-Stuart investigates the magical myth that surrounds the two women.

When the White Queen, Elizabeth Woodville, became the first ‘commoner’ to marry an English king, some muttered she may have used magic to enchant him. Edward was said to be so enamoured with her beauty that he married her in secret, rather than wed a French princess.

However, it was Elizabeth’s mother Jacquetta who was first accused of witchcraft.

In February 1471, Edward IV had lost the English throne after the Earl of Warwick imprisoned him in his castle and reinstated Henry VI.

Warwick also executed Elizabeth’s father, Earl Rivers. Shortly after, the now widowed Jacquetta was accused of witchcraft by one of Warwick’s squires, Thomas Wake.

He brought a broken puppet made of lead to Warwick castle, and said Jacquetta had fashioned it in order to practise witchcraft. To support his allegation, he claimed that a parish clerk called John Daunger knew of two more images, one representing Edward, the other Elizabeth.

By April, Edward was back on the throne, and his Council examined Wake and Daunger’s claims at Jacquetta’s request. Wake said he knew nothing about the puppet until Daunger showed it to him. However, Daunger claimed Wake himself had asked if he could see it. Daunger also denied saying there were images of Edward and Elizabeth. The Council dismissed the whole story.

In the 15th century belief in magic, white or black, was universal throughout society.

Royal persons in both France and England had long been viewed as vulnerable targets of witchcraft. In 1419, the Archbishop of Canterbury wrote to every English bishop, saying that the life of Henry V was being threatened by ‘the heathenish rituals of necromancers’, and ordered public prayers for the King’s protection. In 1429, several knights, gentlemen, and clerics were accused of making a wax image of Henry VI and melting it in order to cause his death, and in 1430 seven women were imprisoned in London on similar charges.

The allegations of witchcraft against the Woodvilles returned, this time directed at Elizabeth. When Edward died of an illness in 1483, their twelve-year-old son was declared King Edward V, while his uncle Richard was appointed Protector. However, within months Richard shut his two nephews in the Tower and took the throne to become Richard III.

In order to undercut their claim to the throne, Richard resurrected the allegations of witchcraft against Elizabeth’s family. Richard’s title to the throne, set out by Parliament in 1484, makes several defamatory claims against Elizabeth and her mother, including the use of sorcery and witchcraft to procure her marriage to King Edward. Yet no proof was ever advanced and Richard never brought Elizabeth to trial.

Witchcraft itself was not a crime on the statute book at this time. Witches – female or male – were not punished simply for being witches. When accusations were made against Elizabeth it was not so much against the practice of magic itself, rather what it had been commissioned for. It wasn’t until many years later that that witchcraft became a capital offence.

Although there is no conclusive proof that either Elizabeth or her mother really practised magic, they lived in a time when magic was seen as neither unusual nor exotic. It was just one way among many to solve a practical problem. People believed that it was a way of opening channels between this world and the worlds of spirits, angels, and demons, whose power could then be used for human ends.

The practice of magic could be elaborate or simple – a sentence or two accompanied by gestures, so anyone could use it and most people did. Women would often use magic where brute force or political power was not really open to them.

The widespread belief in magic also allowed Warwick, Richard the Third and others to make accusations against their enemies on little or no evidence and to be believed.

For more on The White Queen check out our Pocket Guide to the series.

Photos/Article Source: BBC

About the author / 


Related Posts


Recent Comments

Legal Disclaimer

All content provided on this blog is for informational purposes only. The owner of this blog makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information on this site or found by following any link on this site. The owner will not be liable for any errors or omissions in this information nor for the availability of this information. The owner will not be liable for any losses, injuries, or damages from the display or use of this information.

THIS BLOG claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to its respectful owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.